A systematic review about randomized clinical trials on digital impressions on sound teeth
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Aim In the dental literature there are a number of studies about digital impressions. They mainly are focused on the reproducibility of the measurements or on the validity, accuracy, trueness and precision of the scans compared with conventional materials, or on the reaction of patients to these new methods. The purpose of this study was to systematically review existing clinical trials reporting about intra oral scanning procedures on sound teeth.
Materials and methods PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were electronically searched and enriched by hand searches. The query terms "randomized clinical trials", "in vivo study", "sound teeth", "intraoral scanner", "digital dentistry" combined with the Boolean operators "OR" and "AND" have been used. No language or time limitation was applied. Selection criteria: oly randomized in vivo studies where sound teeth had been scanned intraorally were considered.
Results Twenty-four out of more than three hundred studies were selected for the review.
Conclusion In literature there are enough randomized clinical trials about sound teeth. They report about many clinical aspects.
Ethics Approvaldigital dentistry
Copyright (c) 2019 Ariesdue
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Osseointegration has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.